Reasons
for being suspicious about AFSM's motive and honesty
Anonymity
We don't know who is
telling the story and that does not inspire trust. There are a number
of possible reasons for it, some more honourable than others. A real
staff member might be afraid of the reaction from Hwayoung fans; it
could be to enable AFSM to tell a lie without Hwayoung knowing that
it wasn't just a mistake because she didn't know what the person
actually witnessed; or it could be because AFSM was not really so innocent and
wanted to prevent Hwayoung presenting her own counter-allegations.
For me though, the most
compelling is that AFSM is Kim Kwang Soo. He had held the
story back as a deterrent to stop Hwayoung talking too much, and to
avoid damaging another of the company's groups, F-ve Dolls (disbanded
November 2014), whose members included Hyoyoung. If it became known
that MBK and KKS were behind the leak they would be dependent on
Hwayoung not wanting to create trouble for T-ara. She would have to
choose between taking the hate and talking about what happened over
the days leading up to the threat. It's unlikely that she would be
concerned about damaging MBK's reputation in those circumstances.
Accusation of playing the victim.
Why would Hwayoung
want to do that? She was doing well in her acting career and had a
new drama series, My Father is Strange, starting a few weeks after
Taxi. Bringing up the subject of problems in T-ara couldn't do her
any good but could be damaging, as we saw, especially if the Hyoyoung
story came out.
All Hwayoung said about T-ara was what Eunjung had
said on The Beatle2 Code in 2013. There was no suggestion of
bullying or any mistreatment and no implication that anyone else was
more to blame for what happened than she was. All the talk of crying
and losing weight was about the time after she left the group, not
before. Anyone who was a staff member at the time will understand
that and know that she didn't weigh just 40kg when she was a T-ara
member.
Suggestion that when Hwayoung said "things
can happen" she was talking about Hyoyoung's threat.
That was one of the things that happened but it
came after three days of conflict between Hwayoung and the other
members, which was what she meant. The threat was bad but there was
no actual violence and it doesn't mean the twins are the most evil
people in Korea as I have seen some T-ara fans suggest. Far worse
things happen every day, it was probably more an expression of
drunken anger than a real intention to scratch Areums face, and
Hwayoung had nothing to do with it, but it was a shock for sweet,
sensitive Areum and she has my sympathy.
Use of Areum as a weapon without her consent
Hyoyoung had apologised years earlier and Areum has said that she
was very upset by the criticism the twins received because of this
story. As that was an obvious consequence of revealing it I think it
is very unlikely that she would have agreed to it.
The picture of Areum used to accompany the
article
Why use a picture that had brought Areum so much
unwanted attention, with suggestions that she was possessed? Probably
to make people associate that with the threat from Hyoyoung and
increase anger among the fans.
Reasons for suspecting KKS
The messages
Why did AFSM have a copy of Hyoyoung's messages?
It isn't normal for an employee to take information like that when
leaving a company but it is understandable for MBK to have it.
Timing
Why then and not years before? T-ara's fans often
say that Hwayoung continually played the victim for years (but can
never give me an example) so there should have been plenty of
opportunities to use that excuse for leaking the story, but it's
possible that AFSM had only recently left the company.
T-ara were MBK's biggest source of income and the
members' contracts were all due to expire that year, Soyeon's and
Boram's in just a few months. Restoring T-ara's reputation and
boosting their popularity would have been seen as a way to encourage
them to stay with the company. There was some risk involved, but it
was probably seen as a risk worth taking given the potential reward,
and Hwayoung had already shown that she didn't want to do any harm to
T-ara.
Preparation
TVN's trailer encouraged a hostile mood among
fans, but we all know it doesn't take much to do that.
AKP staff reported "She'll be fully opening
up about her leave from T-ara on next week's episode of 'Taxi'."
An AKP user wrote "Hwayoung will
also open up about the past controversy with T-ara."
[AKP]Hwayoung to open up about the past controversy with T-ara on 'Taxi'
Neither
of those is really true, but the latter is far more misleading.
Hwayoung was not asked about the controversy and only said the same
as Eunjung had said previously.
The
episode was shown on 8th February 2017, but the fans were
already discussing it on 1st February, making comments
like these. Bear in mind that at this time there was no information about what she said; these people are just assuming it's something bad, even though it never was before.
“Again
using t-ara”
“Oh
my god can't she leave T-ara alone already??
Looks
like she still always has to bring them up to boost her 'career'"
“Don't
worry, Queen's (T-ara fans) will
call her out on her bullshit if she tries to victimize herself again
She
really is a good actress, she fooled a whole nation into believing
she was "bullied" and now she tries to get popular with
that because back then she realized that she never stood out in T-ara
at all lol”
The story told
by AFSM was ready to go immediately when the show was aired and
appears to be a premeditated attack on the twins, not a reaction to
the broadcast. This is a definite red flag. Either AFSM decided,
without having seen the interview, to prepare the story and claim
that s/he couldn't watch Hwayoung play the victim any more (something
she never did), or it was prepared by MBK, perhaps
after a tip-off from someone at TVN, but it is very possible that MBK
was involved from the very beginning.
KKS
knew people in the industry and he could easily arrange to have
Hwayoung invited onto a show and asked the right questions so that
the answers could be spun as victim-playing. That could be followed
by having Kim Woori on a show and getting him to talk about Hwayoung
and the staff and editing it to make Hwayoung look bad. That was the
knockout blow because the Taxi interview really had no substance.
Record of
lying and treating the members badly
KKS lied about
Hwayoung when he sacked her and is now being investigated for vote
rigging in the Produce 101 survival show.
Edit: He was was convicted in January 2021.
On January 22, legal
sources reported that the Seoul Central District Court had sentenced
Kim Kwang Soo, the general producer of MBK Entertainment, and “Park”
(Park Kyu Heon), the CEO of PocketDol Studio, which is a subsidiary
of MBK, to fines of 10 million won each (about $9,100). , the general
producer of MBK Entertainment, and “Park” (Park Kyu Heon), the
CEO of PocketDol Studio, which is a subsidiary of MBK, to fines of 10
million won each (about $9,100).
The two have been indicted on charges of
obstruction of business. Both have been charged with buying 10,000
IDs between March and April 2016 and making MBK Entertainment
employees use these borrowed IDs to vote and raise the rankings of
three trainees from the agency. This resulted in about 89,228 false
votes being cast in the third and final rounds of voting in the first
season of “Produce 101.”
The court stated, “The defendants used illegal
methods to raise the rankings of their agency trainees on the
audition program by acquiring false IDs en masse and forcing company
employees and trainees to vote. This had an effect on the rankings.
Even though the defendants had produced and planned audition-style
programs themselves, they not only failed to cultivate a clear,
transparent, and fair business culture, but even used false votes and
other secretive methods to sow distrust.”
https://www.soompi.com/article/1450068wpp/mbk-entertainment-producer-and-pocketdol-studio-ceo-receive-fine-for-produce-101-vote-manipulation
When Hwayoung
was fired KKS said that 19 staff members out 19 wanted her to go. Was
that vote rigged too?
The way he overworked the members and made them fear for their places was probably one of the biggest causes of the tension that led to the scandal.
Lack of any sense of AFSM being there
It's all very impersonal, as if was written by
someone who has been told about the events and not by a witness. It
even includes this sentence:
"Seeing everything happen from afar, on
one hand, I understand why the members said those things."
There
is an apparent claim of being there in the next paragraph but it is
undermined by a false claim about what the doctor said.
"So
we went to the hospital in Japan. Sure enough, they
said there was nothing wrong and she wouldn’t need a cast."
The staff interviewed for the Dispatch article,
which is certainly not biased in favour of Hwayoung, reported that
the hospital said the ankle didn't need a cast but did require
further treatment. That is very different from saying there was
nothing wrong. This article is one that fans often cite as proof of
Hwayoung's guilt and is certainly not biased in her favour.
AFSM
then makes another "error."
"Hyomin tried
first to talk to Hwayoung, but Hwayoung said, ‘There’s nothing
that I feel bad for, so I have no reason so say sorry,’ which cut
off any conversation. And that’s when it happened: the threatening
messages from Hyoyoung to Areum."
Again
the staff interviewed by Dispatch tell a different story.
The following
is the testimony of a staff member who has been close to T-ara and in
his private life
'"Hyomin tried
to start a conversation. She sincerely wanted to address the
problem. Hwayoung saw that sincerity too. She said, ‘I got
it,” she walked alone afterwards and practiced by herself. Her
expression was different.”
According to this staff, the situation was
thought to be resolved with that. Then Hwayoung’s unnie,
Hyoyoung, sent out the text messages exactly 1 hour before Music Bank
went live.
Conclusion
Is AFSM really KKS? I can't say for certain, but I think it's very likely. Until the question is asked and answered in Korea we won't really know.
The other question is this. If the story was revealed in such a dishonest way, with no concern for how Areum would be affected, how much of it should we believe? I have never thought that it was the whole truth or pure truth; there is some truth in it, but to me it always seemed insincere and cynical.
No comments:
Post a Comment